Enterprise Risk Intelligence: Machine Learning Models for Predicting Compliance, Fraud, and Operational Failures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9246.IJETCSIT-V4I2P117Keywords:
Enterprise Risk Intelligence, Compliance Risk Prediction, Fraud Detection, Operational Risk Modeling, Machine Learning, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, BiLSTM-FCN, Anomaly Detection, SHAP, LIME, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)Abstract
Companies are growing more vulnerable to interdependent and intricate risks of regulatory non-compliance, financial fraud, and operation breakdowns. Traditional rule-based monitoring and periodic audits struggle to cope with the scale, velocity, and heterogeneity of modern enterprise data, leading to delayed detection and residual risk. This paper suggests a unified Enterprise Risk Intelligence framework which uses machine learning (ML) models to forecast compliance violations, fraud cases, and business outages with one data and feature engineering pipeline. Heterogeneous data sources such as compliance logs, financial transactions and events of the operational system are merged in an enterprise records layer and converted to risk indicators of event frequency, severity, and cross-domain dependencies. Above this base, ensemble models like Gradient Boosting and Random Forests, and then augmented with time-series architectures, like BiLSTM-FCN, provide high predictive accuracy on both types of risk, and their performance is assessed by AUC, precision, recall, F1 score and AUPRC. The transparency of a specific model and the need to extract rules and liabilities makes the implementation of a focused model interpretability layer through SHAP, LIME, and rule extraction an essential requirement of extremely regulated settings. The framework is deployed in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) systems in a scalable, secure manner through APIs, alerting systems, and dashboards, taking into consideration the data governance, privacy, and regulatory limitations. The data quality, imbalance, and concept drift identified in error analysis and segment-level diagnostics are the main challenges that encourage the continuation of future research in continual learning, graph-based risk modeling, and fairness-aware risk analytics.
Downloads
References
[1] Van Liebergen, B. (2017). Machine learning: a revolution in risk management and compliance?. Journal of financial transformation, 45, 60-67.
[2] Aparicio-Gavilan, M., García-Pérez, I., & Zevallos-Núñez, F. (2020). Machine learning application for tax compliance risk prediction: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(23), 10077.
[3] Schwartz, G. N., & Johnson, E. H. (2021). Machine learning for legal risk assessment in health data systems: A review. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 13(2), 1-18.
[4] Huang, B., Wei, J., Tang, Y., & Liu, C. (2021). Enterprise risk assessment based on machine learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021(1), 6049195.
[5] Jurgovsky, J., Al-Azani, S., Al-Otaibi, Z., & Al-Tais, M. (2020). Comparative analysis of machine learning models for banking fraud detection. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 4(1), 1-15.
[6] Model performance metrics, AWS, online. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/frauddetector/latest/ug/training-performance-metrics.html
[7] Jha, S., Jain, S., & Singh, A. (2019). A comparative study of credit card fraud detection using machine learning. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(25), 32-37.
[8] Malik, V., & Singh, Y. (2021). Machine learning models for credit risk management in banking: A systematic review. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 8(01), 2150003.
[9] Ali, A., Abd Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Eisa, T. A. E., Al-Dhaqm, A., Nasser, M., ... & Saif, A. (2022). Financial fraud detection based on machine learning: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9637.
[10] Srivastava, S., & Sharma, P. (2021). A machine learning based financial audit framework for enterprise high risk identification. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(5), 1301-1320.
[11] Amini, M., & Alinaghi, B. (2020). The role of machine learning in risk prediction and prevention models for enterprise digital transformation. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (pp. 112-117).
[12] How machine learning works for payment fraud detection and prevention, stripe, online. https://stripe.com/in/resources/more/how-machine-learning-works-for-payment-fraud-detection-and-prevention
[13] Khudyakov, P., Gorfine, M., Zucker, D., & Spiegelman, D. (2015). The impact of covariate measurement error on risk prediction. Statistics in medicine, 34(15), 2353-2367.
[14] Keller, M. S., Qureshi, N., Albertson, E., Pevnick, J., Brandt, N., Bui, A., & Sarkisian, C. A. (2023). Comparing risk prediction models aimed at predicting hospitalizations for adverse drug events in community dwelling older adults: a protocol paper. Research Square, rs-3.
[15] Rajendran, S., & Karthik, S. (2021). Comparative analysis of explainable machine learning models for cardiovascular risk stratification. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 153, 104523.
