Zero-Trust Multi-Cloud Architecture for Secure Experience Management

Authors

  • Siva Sai Krishna Suryadevara Sr. AEM Cloud Engineer at Maganti IT Resources , USA. Author
  • Anjani Kumar Polinati Senior Software Engineer at Primoris Systems LLC, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9246.IJETCSIT-V4I3P123

Keywords:

Zero-Trust, Multi-Cloud Security, Secure Experience Management (SXM), Continuous Authentication, Policy-as-Code, Identity Federation, Micro-segmentation, SASE, Observability, Risk-Adaptive Access Control, Cloud Workload Protection, User Experience Telemetry

Abstract

Organizations that manage customer and employee experiences across many other cloud platforms now need secure experience management more than ever. As workloads, data, and digital interfaces grow on hyperscalers and SaaS platforms, the user experience is more and more affected by the security & their dependability of service authentication, authorization, and recovery under duress, rather than just by the capabilities of the application. Most multi-cloud security architectures still assume that there are very strong perimeters or trust based on network location, which doesn't work in actual life. They often create identity sprawl, which happens when people, services, and machines have different responsibilities in different cloud environments; policy drift, which happens when access rules differ by their platform and team; and telemetry silos, which make it very hard to see lateral movement and slow down their investigations. This article suggests a zero-trust multi-cloud reference architecture that is specifically made for safe experience management to fill these shortcomings. The architecture assumes that every request is untrustworthy and requires constant verification through strong identity federation, device & workload attestation, and context-sensitive signals (risk, location, behavior, service health). Least-privilege, just-in-time permissions along with micro-segmented service routes limit access. Adaptive policy engines turn intent into consistent controls across cloud environments. A unified observability architecture fully integrates identity, policy decisions, and runtime telemetry, making it easy to find these problems very quickly and respond automatically. A case study shows how to lower risk by lowering the number of over-privileged identities, improve SLA compliance by using strong, policy-driven failover methods & speed up incident resolution by lowering the blast radius and speeding up finding the root cause. The design shows how confidence decisions are constantly available, portable, and completely visible, which may enhance both trustworthy and secure security at the same time. This design accommodates any cloud as well as is based on their general zero-trust concepts. Many other areas, like banking, healthcare, and SaaS, in which seamless and safe multi-cloud experiences are vital, could additionally employ it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Anasuri, Sunil. "Zero-Trust Architectures for Multi-Cloud Environments." International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology 3.4 (2022): 64-76.

[2] Rodigari, Simone, et al. "Performance analysis of zero-trust multi-cloud." 2021 IEEE 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD). IEEE, 2021.

[3] Sidharth, Sharma. "Multi-Cloud Environments: Reducing Security Risks in Distributed Architectures." (2021).

[4] Solanke, Adedamola Abiodun. "Zero trust security architectures for multi-cloud environments: Implementation strategies and measurable outcomes." (2021).

[5] Jonnakuti, Srikanth. "Zero-Trust Architectures for Secure Multi-Cloud AI Workloads." (2021): 88-97.

[6] Sarkar, Sirshak, et al. "Security of zero trust networks in cloud computing: A comparative review." Sustainability 14.18 (2022): 11213.

[7] Ike, Christian Chukwuemeka, et al. "Redefining zero trust architecture in cloud networks: A conceptual shift towards granular, dynamic access control and policy enforcement." Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews 2.1 (2021): 074-086.

[8] Kodela, Venkatesh. "A comparative study of zero trust security implementations across multi-cloud environments: AWS and Azure." Int. J. Commun. Networks Inf. Secur (2018).

[9] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar. "Building ROI-Driven Bots: From Insights Dashboards to Outcome Tracking." International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology 4.1 (2023): 112-123.

[10] Chinamanagonda, Sandeep. "Zero Trust Security Models in Cloud Infrastructure-Adoption of zero-trust principles for enhanced security." Academia Nexus Journal 1.2 (2022).

[11] James, Whitaker. "Architecting Secure Cloud Networks: Balancing Performance, Flexibility, and Zero Trust Principles." International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development 5.3 (2021): 1339-1348.

[12] Balasubramanian, Praveen Nainar. "Automating Hybrid/Multi‑Cloud Zero Trust via MCRA." (2021).

[13] Jacob, Isabella, Rita Lawson, and Jade Adrain. "Zero Trust Security in Multi-Cloud Environments The Role of AI and Quantum Computing." (2021).

[14] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar, and Srinivas Achanta. "Transforming Government Workflows with AI-Driven RPA." International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies 3.4 (2022): 82-92.

[15] Sreerangapuri, Ashok, and Abhishek Kombathula. "Zero Trust Security Model in Infrastructure Transition: Best Practices for Securing Cloud and Hybrid Environments." NEUROQUANTOLOGY 20.6 (2022): 101630-101636.

[16] Peter, Harry. "Emerging Threats and Best Practices in Cloud Security Protecting Data in Multi-Cloud Environments." (2022).

[17] Oladosu, Sunday Adeola, et al. "Reimagining multi-cloud interoperability: A conceptual framework for seamless integration and security across cloud platforms." Open Access Res J Sci Technol 4.1 (2022): 26.

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Suryadevara SSK, Polinati AK. Zero-Trust Multi-Cloud Architecture for Secure Experience Management. IJETCSIT [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Apr. 8];4(3):228-39. Available from: https://ijetcsit.org/index.php/ijetcsit/article/view/670

Similar Articles

1-10 of 510

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.